Using two conditional probabilities to answer a yes-or-no question
The previous question asked you to compute one conditional. This one asks you to compute two and then say what they mean — and the marks are in the second half.
A short walkthrough explaining what you need to know and how to solve this question type lands here once it's recorded.
ALEKS randomizes the numbers each attempt, but the question shape stays the same. Here are three example versions you might see.
220 seedlings were grown with or without a fertiliser.
Fertilised: 84 flowered, 36 did not. Unfertilised: 35 flowered, 65 did not.
What is the probability a seedling flowered, given that it was fertilised? Round to the nearest hundredth.
Same 220 seedlings. Fertilised: 84 flowered, 36 did not (120 in total). Unfertilised: 35 flowered, 65 did not (100 in total).
A classmate says “84 flowered with fertiliser and only 35 without, so fertiliser more than doubles flowering.” Is that reasoning sound? Enter 1 for yes, 0 for no.
250 customers were shown one of two checkout layouts.
Layout A: 39 completed, 61 abandoned. Layout B: 59 completed, 91 abandoned.
What is the completion rate for Layout B? Round to the nearest hundredth.
A company looked at whether its optional training course was associated with promotion. It recorded 300 employees.
Round each probability to the nearest hundredth.
The rate inside the first group
The same rate inside the other group
Now say what it means
What this does and does not show
The two rates differ by 22 percentage points, so the honest answer is yes, attendance and promotion are associated.
Worth being precise about the word, because ALEKS is: associated is not the same as caused. The people who volunteer for optional training may already be the more ambitious ones, and this table cannot separate the two explanations. Saying “associated” is correct and saying “the training caused the promotions” goes further than the evidence.